103
Negro Libre says:
June 19, 2013 at 3:44 pm
Not to be a conspiracy theorist, but have any of you guys heard of Norman Dodd and the Reece Commission?
104
Swithunus says:
June 19, 2013 at 3:50 pm
Yeah, I agree that you need to spell out all the conditions needed. However, if everyone that would perform the experiment has the same bias then you don’t need to point out any such “messy details” that might reveal such biases and make people more wary and you can still get the same results.
as long as they are required to make public the conditions, then real scientists get to pick holes in the bullshit aspects of the experiment.
That’s what I’m after…
It might even shame of them into actually doing real science… teh horror!
CAGW – yeah, the real world science keeps pushing down the maximum sensitivity to CO2 and the related feedback required to generate apocalyptic scenarios.